Emerson College’s only independent, student-run newspaper since 1947

The Berkeley Beacon

Emerson College’s only independent, student-run newspaper since 1947

The Berkeley Beacon

Emerson College’s only independent, student-run newspaper since 1947

The Berkeley Beacon

SGA should choose Snelgrove over snacks

Recent action by our own student leaders rendered a shocking answer to this question.

According to the Student Government Association (SGA), the organization charged with distributing over $400,000 in undergraduate activity fees this year, the snacks take top prize.,Which is worth more: the memory of a student tragically killed or overpriced food?

Recent action by our own student leaders rendered a shocking answer to this question.

According to the Student Government Association (SGA), the organization charged with distributing over $400,000 in undergraduate activity fees this year, the snacks take top prize.

At a recent meeting, elected student leaders decided to provide hungry students attending Nov. 6’s “Town Meeting” event with nearly $200 worth of Aramark-produced snacks.

During the same meeting, SGA members also decided against giving $150 to a scholarship honoring Torie Snelgrove, the Emerson broadcast journalism student who was fatally shot during the October 2004 riot that followed a league championship win over the New York Yankees.

With so much funding at its disposal, the SGA’s recent show of stinginess leads The Beacon to wonder exactly what determines a good enough cause for the SGA to take on.

After Snelgrove’s death, members of the 2004/2005 student government board elected not to take a stand against so-called “less lethal” weapons, rejecting a request for the organization to join hundreds of Emersonians who signed a petition put forth by a non-profit group.

At the time, SGA members said they were fearful of attaching the student government’s name to a politicized petition circulated by a peace-oriented group.

Instead, it tarnished its image by refusing to stand by an enraged student body that was still racked with both grief over the loss of Snelgrove and anger at Boston Police and the city officials who were slow to take responsibility for the shooting and halfhearted about the situation when they actually did.

Now, some of our current representatives are reluctant to give a mere $150-less than the student activity fee Snelgrove would have paid if she were still alive and enrolled at Emerson-because the proposal didn’t come with enough documentation.

How much documentation does the SGA really need to justify putting less than 0.001 percent of total student fees toward a scholarship honoring the memory of a fallen student?

Some board members were also opposed to the idea that SGA funds paid by every undergraduate student would go toward a scholarship only benefiting journalism students.

While The Beacon enjoys 8 percent of the SGA’s yearly student-fueled budget, we are forced by this recent assertion to wonder how refusing money for a journalism scholarship is any different than the thousands of dollars poured each year into accounts for organizations targeting students in specific majors, such as The Emerson Review, FPS and the Musical Theatre Society.

If the SGA is seriously committed to providing funding only for causes and organizations that truly serve a plurality of students, it should spend time refocusing its commitment to the people it is supposed to serve: all Emerson undergraduates.

As is the case with many planned SGA events, it is unlikely that a large number of participants will show up for Monday’s Town Meeting. Most, in fact, will probably be journalism students assigned to cover the event for class.

And no matter how tasty those treats may be at first bite, students will still be left with a sour taste in their mouths.

Leave a Comment
Donate to The Berkeley Beacon

Your donation will support the student journalists of Emerson College. Your contribution will allow us to purchase equipment and cover our annual website hosting costs.

Donate to The Berkeley Beacon

Comments (0)

The Berkeley Beacon intends for this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. We welcome strong opinions and criticism that are respectful and constructive. All users are expected to adhere to our comment section policy laid out below: (A) THE FOLLOWING IS NOT PERMITTED: 1- Name-calling, personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity, impersonations, SHOUTING and incoherence. 2- Personal attacks against our staff. 3- language that might be interpreted as libelous (defamatory). 4- Any form of personal and/or commercial promotion. (B) HOW WE MODERATE COMMENTS: Most comments will be posted if they are on-topic, article related and not abusive. Comment moderation decisions are subjective and completely at the discretion of the current website editor and Berkeley Beacon Staff. (C) USER VERIFICATION: All comments on our site must be approved by Berkeley Beacon staff to ensure that they meet the Comment Section Policies. The Berkeley Beacon also requires a valid email address from anyone who wishes to comment. Once you have submitted your comment for review you will immediately receive an automated email to confirm your email address (Comments will NOT be approved if you have not confirmed your email address). Your email address will not be displayed or available to the public and will only be used to confirm your comments. Comments will typically be reviewed within 24-48 hours.
All Sort: Newest

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *